الأحد، 29 يوليو 2012

Dual GPU Question

I have an AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD graphics, I have been told this means the GPU is intergrated with the CPU is that right?

And my main question is what is the best GPU I can crossfire with my current GPU and is there a way to replace my current GPU without changing the CPU.

Cheers

Dual GPU Question

I have an AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD graphics, I have been told this means the GPU is intergrated with the CPU is that right?

And my main question is what is the best GPU I can crossfire with my current GPU and is there a way to replace my current GPU without changing the CPU.

Cheers

Dual GPU Question

I have an AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD graphics, I have been told this means the GPU is intergrated with the CPU is that right?

And my main question is what is the best GPU I can crossfire with my current GPU and is there a way to replace my current GPU without changing the CPU.

Cheers

The Hardware Shopping MegaThread

This topic is being created to stop the constant questions about which site to use for buying products. We will list sites by Country.

*NOTE*

If this thread gets out of hand AT ALL, meaning that someone posts a site and someone else later comes by and gives them any kind of flak saying the site is junk, there will be instant Infractions given. No pleas, no questions nothing. The first sign of any kind of arguement and all parties involved get infractions. This is the ONE AND ONLY WARNING.

This topic is for informative purposes. It is to help guide people to sites to use for buying parts. It will be edited and sites for other countries added once they are suggested. No site will be bashed for the sheer sake of it. A site will be added once it has been researched.

So please when posting make sure to give the Country you are from or posting for and list the name of the site and a link. Thank you.

USA

NewEgg | TigerDirect | ZipZoomFly | Buy.com | Amazon | SVC.com | eCost | iBuyPower | CyberPowerPC | Frys.com | CompUSA | BestBuy | Dell | eBay | NCIXUS | MicroCenter

UK

Scan | Ebuyer | Dabs | Aria PC | Overclockers UK | Misco | Novatech | Microdirect | LinITX | Overclockers UK | KustomPCs

Australia

ARC Computers | Harris Technology | MSY Computers | PC Case Gear |

Sweden

Inet | Dustin | NetOnNet

Canada

NCIX | Newegg | Dell | DirectCanada | TigerDirect | Canada Computers | BestDirect | PC Cyber Canada



Specialty Shops

FrozenCPU | Performance PCs | Petras | SVC | MNPCTech

The Hardware Shopping MegaThread

This topic is being created to stop the constant questions about which site to use for buying products. We will list sites by Country.

*NOTE*

If this thread gets out of hand AT ALL, meaning that someone posts a site and someone else later comes by and gives them any kind of flak saying the site is junk, there will be instant Infractions given. No pleas, no questions nothing. The first sign of any kind of arguement and all parties involved get infractions. This is the ONE AND ONLY WARNING.

This topic is for informative purposes. It is to help guide people to sites to use for buying parts. It will be edited and sites for other countries added once they are suggested. No site will be bashed for the sheer sake of it. A site will be added once it has been researched.

So please when posting make sure to give the Country you are from or posting for and list the name of the site and a link. Thank you.

USA

NewEgg | TigerDirect | ZipZoomFly | Buy.com | Amazon | SVC.com | eCost | iBuyPower | CyberPowerPC | Frys.com | CompUSA | BestBuy | Dell | eBay | NCIXUS | MicroCenter

UK

Scan | Ebuyer | Dabs | Aria PC | Overclockers UK | Misco | Novatech | Microdirect | LinITX | Overclockers UK | KustomPCs

Australia

ARC Computers | Harris Technology | MSY Computers | PC Case Gear |

Sweden

Inet | Dustin | NetOnNet

Canada

NCIX | Newegg | Dell | DirectCanada | TigerDirect | Canada Computers | BestDirect | PC Cyber Canada



Specialty Shops

FrozenCPU | Performance PCs | Petras | SVC | MNPCTech

The Hardware Shopping MegaThread

This topic is being created to stop the constant questions about which site to use for buying products. We will list sites by Country.

*NOTE*

If this thread gets out of hand AT ALL, meaning that someone posts a site and someone else later comes by and gives them any kind of flak saying the site is junk, there will be instant Infractions given. No pleas, no questions nothing. The first sign of any kind of arguement and all parties involved get infractions. This is the ONE AND ONLY WARNING.

This topic is for informative purposes. It is to help guide people to sites to use for buying parts. It will be edited and sites for other countries added once they are suggested. No site will be bashed for the sheer sake of it. A site will be added once it has been researched.

So please when posting make sure to give the Country you are from or posting for and list the name of the site and a link. Thank you.

USA

NewEgg | TigerDirect | ZipZoomFly | Buy.com | Amazon | SVC.com | eCost | iBuyPower | CyberPowerPC | Frys.com | CompUSA | BestBuy | Dell | eBay | NCIXUS | MicroCenter

UK

Scan | Ebuyer | Dabs | Aria PC | Overclockers UK | Misco | Novatech | Microdirect | LinITX | Overclockers UK | KustomPCs

Australia

ARC Computers | Harris Technology | MSY Computers | PC Case Gear |

Sweden

Inet | Dustin | NetOnNet

Canada

NCIX | Newegg | Dell | DirectCanada | TigerDirect | Canada Computers | BestDirect | PC Cyber Canada



Specialty Shops

FrozenCPU | Performance PCs | Petras | SVC | MNPCTech

Google faces new Street View data controversy

Google
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks. Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Google is facing a fresh privacy blunder after it admitted it had not deleted all of the private data, including emails and passwords, it secretly collected from internet users around the UK.
The search giant was ordered in December 2010 to delete the private information hoovered up by its Street View cars from open Wi-Fi networks.
But on Friday Google told the Information Commissioner's Office that human error prevented it from erasing the data, which could include the emails and passwords of millions of Britons.
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks around the world.
It is not known exactly what private information was taken in the UK, but regulators in the US found traces of medical records and web browsing history among the so-called "payload" data.
The news that Google has not purged all of the data taken from UK users 19 months after it was instructed to do so will cause further embarrassment for the company.
On Friday, the ICO said the retention of the data appeared to be a breach of the undertaking signed by Google in December 2010.
A spokesman for the ICO said it would now conduct a forensic analysis of the data, meaning Google could be fined up to £500,000 if the material is found to be in breach of the Data Protection Act.
The company will be one of the first to have breached an undertaking by the ICO if the data is found to be in breach of the DPA.
The ICO said in a statement: "The ICO is clear that this information should never have been collected in the first place and the company's failure to secure its deletion as promised is cause for concern."
Google's global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer, apologised for the error in a letter to the ICO on Friday. Google declined to comment beyond the letter, which was published on the ICO website.
The technology company is already being investigated by the ICO over claims it orchestrated a cover-up of the data collection in 2010.
Google declined to say when it realised it had not deleted all of the data.
Nick Pickles, director of privacy at the pressure group Big Brother Watch, said Google should never have been ordered to erase the information in the first place.
"We now have an opportunity to explore just how sensitive the information was," he said.
"Given that Google failed to respect people's privacy in the first place and subsequently failed to adhere to its agreement with the information commissioner, serious questions need to be asked to understand why Google seemingly sees itself as above the law.
"The information commissioner is hampered by a woeful lack of powers and is forced to trust organisations to tell the truth. Given Google's behaviour has called into question if that really is a proper way to protect our personal data, it must be right to now demand a proper regulator with the powers and punishments to fully protect British people's privacy."

Google faces new Street View data controversy

Google
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks. Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Google is facing a fresh privacy blunder after it admitted it had not deleted all of the private data, including emails and passwords, it secretly collected from internet users around the UK.
The search giant was ordered in December 2010 to delete the private information hoovered up by its Street View cars from open Wi-Fi networks.
But on Friday Google told the Information Commissioner's Office that human error prevented it from erasing the data, which could include the emails and passwords of millions of Britons.
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks around the world.
It is not known exactly what private information was taken in the UK, but regulators in the US found traces of medical records and web browsing history among the so-called "payload" data.
The news that Google has not purged all of the data taken from UK users 19 months after it was instructed to do so will cause further embarrassment for the company.
On Friday, the ICO said the retention of the data appeared to be a breach of the undertaking signed by Google in December 2010.
A spokesman for the ICO said it would now conduct a forensic analysis of the data, meaning Google could be fined up to £500,000 if the material is found to be in breach of the Data Protection Act.
The company will be one of the first to have breached an undertaking by the ICO if the data is found to be in breach of the DPA.
The ICO said in a statement: "The ICO is clear that this information should never have been collected in the first place and the company's failure to secure its deletion as promised is cause for concern."
Google's global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer, apologised for the error in a letter to the ICO on Friday. Google declined to comment beyond the letter, which was published on the ICO website.
The technology company is already being investigated by the ICO over claims it orchestrated a cover-up of the data collection in 2010.
Google declined to say when it realised it had not deleted all of the data.
Nick Pickles, director of privacy at the pressure group Big Brother Watch, said Google should never have been ordered to erase the information in the first place.
"We now have an opportunity to explore just how sensitive the information was," he said.
"Given that Google failed to respect people's privacy in the first place and subsequently failed to adhere to its agreement with the information commissioner, serious questions need to be asked to understand why Google seemingly sees itself as above the law.
"The information commissioner is hampered by a woeful lack of powers and is forced to trust organisations to tell the truth. Given Google's behaviour has called into question if that really is a proper way to protect our personal data, it must be right to now demand a proper regulator with the powers and punishments to fully protect British people's privacy."

Google faces new Street View data controversy

Google
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks. Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Google is facing a fresh privacy blunder after it admitted it had not deleted all of the private data, including emails and passwords, it secretly collected from internet users around the UK.
The search giant was ordered in December 2010 to delete the private information hoovered up by its Street View cars from open Wi-Fi networks.
But on Friday Google told the Information Commissioner's Office that human error prevented it from erasing the data, which could include the emails and passwords of millions of Britons.
Google admitted in May 2010 its Street View cars had mistakenly collected private information as they photographed homes and landmarks around the world.
It is not known exactly what private information was taken in the UK, but regulators in the US found traces of medical records and web browsing history among the so-called "payload" data.
The news that Google has not purged all of the data taken from UK users 19 months after it was instructed to do so will cause further embarrassment for the company.
On Friday, the ICO said the retention of the data appeared to be a breach of the undertaking signed by Google in December 2010.
A spokesman for the ICO said it would now conduct a forensic analysis of the data, meaning Google could be fined up to £500,000 if the material is found to be in breach of the Data Protection Act.
The company will be one of the first to have breached an undertaking by the ICO if the data is found to be in breach of the DPA.
The ICO said in a statement: "The ICO is clear that this information should never have been collected in the first place and the company's failure to secure its deletion as promised is cause for concern."
Google's global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer, apologised for the error in a letter to the ICO on Friday. Google declined to comment beyond the letter, which was published on the ICO website.
The technology company is already being investigated by the ICO over claims it orchestrated a cover-up of the data collection in 2010.
Google declined to say when it realised it had not deleted all of the data.
Nick Pickles, director of privacy at the pressure group Big Brother Watch, said Google should never have been ordered to erase the information in the first place.
"We now have an opportunity to explore just how sensitive the information was," he said.
"Given that Google failed to respect people's privacy in the first place and subsequently failed to adhere to its agreement with the information commissioner, serious questions need to be asked to understand why Google seemingly sees itself as above the law.
"The information commissioner is hampered by a woeful lack of powers and is forced to trust organisations to tell the truth. Given Google's behaviour has called into question if that really is a proper way to protect our personal data, it must be right to now demand a proper regulator with the powers and punishments to fully protect British people's privacy."

Substitute animals



We used to live immersed in the earth. We used to be part of the corporeal earth, along with the other animals, along with the plants, the rocks the dust. Now we are separate, we make concrete models of them and place them in parking lots in strip malls.

Mute, they watch us buying things we don't need, with money we don't have, driving cars we don't own.

This is a tribute to the substitute animals.

http://youtu.be/Ir7FBwn1yPg

The hunter. The lion watches over use.
Ever present.
The heart of the lion.
Coeur de lion.

Humans used to have such a heart. Now the human heart is hardened. It is no longer expansive. It can no longer properly connect the body, mind and soul. The heart is ischaemic, it contracts, it gets blocked.



Humans stuff their heads and hang them on the walls of their bars.



Humans hunt them, eat them, devour them and their homes, their places of refuge. Blasting, extracting, drilling and fracking.

Substitute animals



We used to live immersed in the earth. We used to be part of the corporeal earth, along with the other animals, along with the plants, the rocks the dust. Now we are separate, we make concrete models of them and place them in parking lots in strip malls.

Mute, they watch us buying things we don't need, with money we don't have, driving cars we don't own.

This is a tribute to the substitute animals.

http://youtu.be/Ir7FBwn1yPg

The hunter. The lion watches over use.
Ever present.
The heart of the lion.
Coeur de lion.

Humans used to have such a heart. Now the human heart is hardened. It is no longer expansive. It can no longer properly connect the body, mind and soul. The heart is ischaemic, it contracts, it gets blocked.



Humans stuff their heads and hang them on the walls of their bars.



Humans hunt them, eat them, devour them and their homes, their places of refuge. Blasting, extracting, drilling and fracking.

Substitute animals



We used to live immersed in the earth. We used to be part of the corporeal earth, along with the other animals, along with the plants, the rocks the dust. Now we are separate, we make concrete models of them and place them in parking lots in strip malls.

Mute, they watch us buying things we don't need, with money we don't have, driving cars we don't own.

This is a tribute to the substitute animals.

http://youtu.be/Ir7FBwn1yPg

The hunter. The lion watches over use.
Ever present.
The heart of the lion.
Coeur de lion.

Humans used to have such a heart. Now the human heart is hardened. It is no longer expansive. It can no longer properly connect the body, mind and soul. The heart is ischaemic, it contracts, it gets blocked.



Humans stuff their heads and hang them on the walls of their bars.



Humans hunt them, eat them, devour them and their homes, their places of refuge. Blasting, extracting, drilling and fracking.